![]() |
DOVEDefenders of the Ouse Valley and Estuary |
![]() |
|
|
Climate ChangeGreenhouse gas emissions According to the US Environmental Protection Agency, there is "little to choose" between landfill and incineration in terms of greenhouse gas emissions [1]. A recent study for the Community Recycling Network found that landfilling and incineration of untreated waste were the worst ways of dealing with residual waste in terms of climate change [8]. In particular, burning plastic (although it has a high energy content) is equivalent to burning fossil fuels. Landfilling plastic - and some kinds of paper - is in fact better than burning, because it locks the carbon into the ground instead of releasing it into the atmosphere [1]. In fact, incineration produces only slightly less carbon dioxide per kilowatt-hour of electricity than gas-fired power stations [7]. Recycling is a better option in terms of greenhouse gas emissions than incineration (even with energy recovery). A recent study for the European Commission found that separating waste at source followed by recycling (for paper, metals, textiles and plastics) and composting or anaerobic digestion (for putrescible wastes) gives the lowest net flux of greenhouse gases, compared with other options for the treatment of bulk municipal waste [4]. Recycling of paper helps to protect habitats and reduces greenhouse gas emissions. It is supported by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which says "paper recycling is another strategy with the potential to reduce harvest levels [of timber] and promote greater carbon conservation." [2] Please help us oppose this incinerator!
[1] US EPA (1999) Greenhouse gas emissions from management of selected materials in municipal solid waste. With thanks to Friends of the Earth for the information. |
|
|